Tel: 020 7626 0191


  • QLP Legal,
  • 124 City Road,
  • London, EC1V 2NX

Recovery of third party funding costs in arbitration proceedings

A significant decision handed down by the High Court this week has potential to change the landscape for third party funding in arbitration, allowing it to steal a march on litigation.

Essar v Norscot

In the currently unreported case of Essar Oilfield Services Limited v Norscot Rig Management Pvt Limited the Court upheld the decision of the ICC arbitrator to allow the recovery of the costs of third party funding in addition to the award of costs and damages.

Having succeed in the arbitration Norscot sought it’s costs from Essar, including the costs of litigation funding which it had been forced to incur in order to pursue the claim. The funding consisted of an advance of £647,086.49 which was repayable in the event of a successful outcome, along with a success fee of either 300% of the sum advanced, or 35% of the damages, whichever was the greater. The sole arbitrator found the funding costs to be recoverable as “other costs” as provided for under the Arbitration Act 1996 and the applicable ICC Arbitration Rules.

In dismissing the subsequent appeal, the High Court accepted that terms of section 59(1)(c), including reference to “legal and other costs” was wide enough to permit the recovery of third party funding costs – the correct test involved considering what ‘other’ costs were incurred in bringing or defending a claim, according to the circumstances.

Until the full judgment is available it is difficult to fully consider the implications of this case. That said, it opens a very interesting debate about third party funding and arbitration. Some points to consider:

We will also wait with interest to see whether the applicant seeks to obtain permission to appeal.